Instrumentalization of the Unconsenting: Definition, Ethics, and Power Dynamics
Definition : The principle is simple: using a normal person, who is unaware of anything, as a prop in your game.
- Keywords
- unconsenting third party, BDSM, Master, delivery person, transgression, submissive, excitement, risk, humiliation, thrill, degradation, Dominant, power, reality, pleasure, red line, consent, ethical violation, legal consequences, disrespect
- Topics
- Humiliation & Degradation
- Updated
What is the Instrumentalization of the Unconsenting?
The principle is simple: using a normal person, who is unaware of anything, as a prop in your game. It’s an ultimate transgression that breaks the BDSM bubble to spill over into the real world. The classic example is that of the delivery person: your Master orders you to kneel, naked, just out of their sight while they sign the receipt.
The Excitement for the Submissive
For the submissive, the excitement comes from the risk and humiliation. It’s the thrill of being exposed, the panic fear of being discovered by this stranger who lives their normal life two meters from your submission. It’s a degradation that feeds on the contrast between your world and theirs.
The Demonstration of Power for the Dominant
For the Dominant, it’s an absolute demonstration of power. They don’t just control their submissive; they control reality itself, manipulating two parallel universes without one suspecting the existence of the other. They play with the social fabric for their own pleasure.
The Red Line: Consent
But this is where the red line lies. BDSM is based on a sacred pillar: the consent of ALL involved. By using an innocent as a prop, you break this golden rule. It’s no longer a game; it’s a profound ethical violation. Depending on the act, it can even have legal consequences. It’s a game that, for many, goes beyond the scope of kink and into that of disrespect.